Home
  • About
    • Philosophy and our goals
    • Governance
    • Organisational structure
    • Patrons
    • Our Impact
    • Tasmania
    • Jobs
    • Search
    • Annual reports
  • Research
    • Research Papers
    • Sort by Author
    • Submissions
    • National Energy Emissions Audit
    • Community Resources
    • Climate & Energy Program
    • Accountability Project
  • In the News
    • Media Releases
    • Infographics
    • Opinion
    • Podcast
    • Videos
    • Our blog
    • Petitions
  • Contact
  • Events
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
    • Make a one off donation
    • Make a regular donation

The direct costs of waiting for direct action

In the 2007 federal election both major parties committed to introducing an Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). By 2009 both parties agreed on an emissions reduction target of five per cent on 2000 levels by 2020. But since Tony Abbott became leader of the Liberal Party the bipartisan position for a reliance on a market based mechanism to reduce Australia's carbon emissions has broken down.

While the Coalition remains committed to the same target as the Government it now proposes to meet that target with a competitive grant scheme which it calls the Direct Action Plan and in turn oppose all forms of market based carbon pricing including the Labor Party's proposed carbon tax that converts into an ETS after three years.

The Coalition is doing more than campaigning against a carbon price. It is the job of an Opposition to be critical of Government policies they disagree with but the Coalition has decided to go much further than critique in committing to 'roll back' the carbon price should they form government . This commitment creates uncertainty in the business community since even if the carbon price passes Parliament it does not resolve the issue and may be subject to a roll back at a later date. Furthermore, the Coalition has also committed to a double dissolution election if it wins government but cannot pass its legislation to roll back the carbon price. This will create even more uncertainty.

Type of Publication: 
Research
Section: 
Environment

Download Publication: 
PDF icon PB 30 The direct costs of waiting for direct action_4.pdf

Author: 
Matt Grudnoff
Posted on:
22 August 2011

>> Share this Page

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

.

The Australia Institute is the country’s most influential progressive think tank. We conduct research on a broad range of economic, social and environmental issues in order to inform public debate and bring greater accountability to the democratic process.

Sitemap:

  • About
  • Philosophy and our goals
  • Research
  • Opinion Pieces
  • In the News
  • Media Releases
  • Make a one off donation
  • Make a regular donation
  • Contact
  • Governance
  • Join mailing list

Other Initiatives

  • Centre for Future Work
  • The Australia Institute Tasmania
  • No New Coal Mines
  • Go Home On Time Day
  • Climate & Energy Program
  • The Australia Institute acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as First Australians and recognise their culture, history, diversity and their deep connection to the land.

    The team at The Australia Institute acknowledges that the Australian Capital Territory is Ngunnawal Country and pay our respects to Elders past and present.

  • Copyright The Australia Institute |
  • RSS feed |
  • Website Privacy Policy